Blog

Grateful for “All Israel”

February 4th, 2010

img_0640The Henry Center is thankful for last night’s conversation on “All Israel”, held in friendly conjunction with Chosen People Ministries.  It was very gratifying to draw 275 people to ATO Chapel and to have well over a hundred more tune in by live webcast for a rich conversation on Scripture, theology, and the future of Israel.

We are also thankful for Drs. Feinberg and Averbeck, organizer and moderator of the event, respectively, for Dr. Mitch Glaser and all that he and his staff did to make this event a success, and for Drs. Moo and VanGemeren for participating.

It is richly encouraging to see nearly 300 people turn out for a high-level debate on a key text of God’s Word.  Those who announce the death of theology might be surprised to see such a reception, which accords with attendance at previous events like the recent Scripture & Ministry lecture by Ravi Zacharias (over 500 people live, over 100 online), and past Trinity Debates (the McCall/Yandell vs. Ware/Grudem had over 450 in person and hundreds online from all over the world, while the Netland vs. Knitter debate drew roughly 300).

Where theology is believed and argued passionately, it seems it can find a large audience in God’s providence.  And it need not be toothless and timid.  Attendance at conversations like “All Israel” show us that there is a definite place for godly disagreement and intellectual advocacy, especially when it is directed toward the edification of the church and, ultimately, the glory of God.

Media will be posted on this site and this blog in coming weeks.  img_0683

“All Israel” Live Blog

February 3rd, 2010

February 3rd, 2010

live-blogged by Chipper Flaniken

(Streaming video is available here)

Welcome to the live blog for the “All Israel” conversation at Trinity Evangelical Divinity School!

Please see below for an official advertisement concerning the conversation. The live blog will begin momentarily.

——————————————————————————————-

On February 3, 2010 from 7pm-9:30 in ATO Chapel at Trinity Evangelical Divinity School, the Henry Center, in conjunction with Chosen People Ministries, will host a conversation entitled “‘All Israel’ and the Church: A Conversation on Scripture, Eschatology, and Evangelism”. Conversational partners will include Dr. Mitch Glaser of CPM, Dr. Douglas Moo of Wheaton College, Dr. Willem VanGemeren of Trinity Evangelical Divinity School, Dr. John Feinberg of TEDS, and the moderator, Dr. Richard Averbeck of TEDS. All are welcome and invited to this free event.

The following outlines possible avenues of discussion:

    In Romans 11 Paul makes the case that God has not cast off his people Israel, despite their rejection as a nation of Jesus, their Messiah. His final argument that God isn’t finished with Israel is that “all Israel will be saved” (Rom 11:25-27). What did Paul mean and how will this come to pass? Who constitutes “Israel,” the biological seed of Abraham or his spiritual seed? Is the salvation in view spiritual, national, socio-economical, or all of these? Has this promise been fulfilled during the NT era by individual Jews and Gentiles turning to Christ and hence “filling up” the “all Israel?” Or is the promise to be fulfilled in the end-times at the return of Christ? If the latter, will only those biologically Jewish be saved, or will there also be a massive turning to Christ among the Gentiles? Whatever the answers to such questions, what are the implications for how Christians should understand the modern state of Israel? And, of most practical importance, how should one’s understanding of Rom 11:25-27 impact one’s attitudes toward and efforts in evangelizing Jews?

——————————————————————————————-

How and When Will All Israel Be Saved?

Conversation with Dr. Feinberg, Dr. Moo, Dr. VanGemeren, Dr. Averbeck (moderator), and Dr. Glaser beginning shortly!

Introductory comments by Dr. Averbeck (moderator) and opening prayer.

Dr. Averbeck is professor of Old Testament and Semitic languages at Trinity Evangelical Divinity School. He has been at Trinity since 1994.

Dr. Douglas Moo - former professor at TEDS for about 20 years, now teaching at Wheaton College. He is the author of A Commentary on the Epistle to the Romans, as well as several other commentaries and books.

Dr. John Feinberg - Chair of the Department of Biblical and Systematic Theology and professor of biblical and systematic theology at Trinity Evangelical Divinity School. He has been at Trinity since 1983. Author of “No One Like Him: The Doctrine of God”.

Dr. Willem VanGemeren - Director of the Doctor of Philosophy in Theological Studies program and professor of Old Testament and Semitic languages at Trinity Evangelical Divinity School. He has taught at Trinity since 1992.

Dr. Mitch Glaser - President, Chosen People Ministries - involved in Jewish evangelism in several countries.

Main passage for the evening is Romans 11:25-27

Four questions for evening panel:

  1. How does Romans 11 fit into Paul’s argument in the book as a whole?
  2. To whom does Paul refer when he speaks of all Israel in Romans 11:26?
  3. What is your understanding of how and when Israel will be saved?
  4. How does your understanding of Scriptures relate to your views of Jewish evangelism today and into the future?

Comments from Dr. Moo:

Question 1:

Will provide little argumentation and little nuance given time constraints

Look at Romans from several perspectives:

A. Takes Romans 9-11 to be integral to Romans as a whole

B. We must make sure that we do not forget Romans 1-8 when trying to understand Romans 9-11.

For example, there are significant issues in Romans 4 concerning the “people of God”.

Thus, people in Romans 1-8 seem to have no ethnic discrimination - spiritual ancestor is Abraham.

C. There is much about “the land” in the Old Testament, but not a lot about the land in the New Testament

see Romans 4:13 - “heir of the world”

Main Point: There seems to be a universalizing hermeneutic in Romans.

Question 2:

If Abraham is indeed the father of those who believe…we might expect the word “Israel” to naturally appear in Romans 9-11.

Also - Galatians 6:16 - Paul uses the word “Israel” to describe the “church”.

But Dr. Moo does not believe Paul does this in Romans 11.

He notes that there is a distinction in verse 25 between Israel and the Gentiles.

Therefore, when Paul predicts “All Israel” will be saved…there is an ethnic component to this, but it does not mean all the Jews that have ever lived. The phrase has a “representative” significance according to a significant number of Jewish people - but not all.

Question 3:

When will All Israel be saved?

There are indications that Paul might be thinking of a process through history. All Israel is being saved…when all of the elect of both Jews and Gentiles are saved. This seems unlikely…

Why might the temporal situation be important?

Dr. Moo: Thinks a significant number of Jews will be saved when Christ returns in glory.

Why? Focus on key verses - note importance of “until” in verse 25.

This naturally suggests there will be a change in the situation at some point in time.

This hardening of the Israelites will cease at a certain time…there will be a significant turning to Christ among the Jewish people.

Question 4:

What are the implications of all of this?

Dr. Moo: seems to be a clear pattern of Old Testament prophecies finding fulfillment in the new people of God in the New Covenant era.

So Romans 11:25-27 - how does it fit into this pattern? Dr. Moo thinks there is a contrast here between Jews and Gentiles. Text “pushes him in that direction”. It forces him to that conclusion about ethnic Israel. But he does not draw many significant consequences from that claim.

Also, it seems as though the promise Paul makes here in Romans 11 does not mean that the Jews will inhabit a certain land.

Finally - what about Jewish evangelism?

Dr. Moo: No significant basis in this text or others that there should be a particular focus on the Jews as far as evangelism. The Gospel should be taken to all nations.

Comments from Dr. Feinberg

Question 1:

Jesus is the savior for all people groups.

God promised great things to Israel in the past, but will they be fulfilled? Have these promises been canceled?

The trustworthiness of God and Gospel are at stake.

So what does Paul say in chapter 9? Israel has an election to privilege, which is not the same as an election to salvation.

Salvation is for a remnant - not from merit - but from grace.

Chapter 10 - Paul shows that Jews who do not turn to Christ…they can’t blame anyone but themselves

Chapter 11 - What about the promises to Israel unconditionally? Chapters 9-10 don’t clearly answer these questions

Paul addresses this in chapter 11. Verse 1 - God has not cast away the Israelites

Why?

There is still a remnant of Jews coming to Christ - such as Paul

Israel’s falling away is part of a divine strategy to win Gentiles and Israelites to Christ.

God will reap a whole number of Israelites

In sum:  God’s promises to Israel will be fulfilled despite the delay! God’s Word can be trusted.

Question 2:

What is the meaning of “All Israel”? It seems as though Romans 9-11 are about ethnic Israel, otherwise it is hard to see how they fit into the book. If not, the contrasts in chapter 11 make very little sense.

But what does “all” mean?

- Doesn’t refer to every Jew that has ever lived…many did not have right relationships with God

- Doesn’t think this is a reference to the church

- Paul doesn’t intend to include OT believers

- Paul doesn’t think that all NT believers will be saved…but a remnant will be saved.

So to what does “All” refer?

See Romans 11:25 - Part of the Jewish nation during the age when Paul was writing will be spiritually blinded. But the blindness will be temporary until the Gentiles have been received in “fullness”.

Paul contrasts current spiritual blinding with future spiritual sight.

Question 3:

When will the future come? No specific date in Scripture.

Dr. Feinberg things it will become at the second Advent

So does “All” refer to every Jew alive at this Second Advent? Possibly, but it also might just refer to the nation as a whole. Some might still be turned away.

A judgment of sheep and goats will come according to Jesus…so these goats may be only Gentiles and the sheep Jews…but Jesus doesn’t say this.

Never underestimate the sinful obstinacy of mankind!

God is certainly able to save every Jew alive.

How will they be saved?

Zechariah 12 - post-exilic passage

What does Zechariah 12 say? Seems to predict a day in which God will fight for Israel and confuse the enemy of Israel. Israel’s enemy will be defeated. But also…

…verse 10 - grace will be poured out on the people of God

Thus, the Israelites will be moved to plead for forgiveness and then turn towards the Lord.

Again, when will this be fulfilled?

In the climatic battle at Armageddon at the end of the Tribulation. Jesus seems to confirm this in Matthew 24.

Dr. Feinberg: None of what I presented contradicts Paul’s explanation in Romans 9-11

Question 4:

Romans 11 is not a mandate for Jewish evangelism…the Great Commission is.

But this should be an encouragement to bring the Gospel to the Jews. There is no evidence that the fullness of Jews has been brought in. The remnant is incomplete. Evangelism to the Jews is not futile!

In the coming day…the nation as a whole will respond to Christ.

How far are we from these events? Hard to know…but the Tribulation could start this year for all we know.

Also, seeds sown could bear fruit in in the future when Jews look upon Christ and repent.

Regardless of how far we are from these events…we should be obedient to the Great Commission, and we don’t want to see anyone experience a Christ-less eternity.

The passages tonight encourage us to evangelize.

Comments from Dr. VanGemeren

Question 1:

Paul has a concern for all people…the voice of God in Scripture is an echo of the Creator.

At the same time, Paul argues that all  people may be spiritual children of Abraham (see Romans 4). Abraham received inheritance…and all with faith in Christ will share in this.

Paul sees himself as a representative of Israel called to be a light to the Gentiles. The Jewish people have received much light, and as such he is called to be a light to the nations.

Paul is zealous in his ministry to the Gentiles in order to provoke Israel to jealousy (see Romans 11). He is jealous for salvation for both groups.

Also, there is a mystery in Romans 11 and Romans 16. Paul knows that his mission is in accordance with Scripture and the mystery of God.

Where God has accorded to him an insight as to redemptive history…the prophets didn’t understand this.

Question 2:

There was a hardening, but there is and will be a believing community from Israel. Paul thinks that Israel will again be a part of the people of God. He is speaking of ethnic Israel…not necessarily a political reality

God’s purposes with Israel are not over yet. His gifts and his calling are irrevocable (Paul’s).  And note that the citations he uses demonstrate that he depends on the OT for his descriptions and understanding as described in Romans 11

All of these acts are in accordance with the Scriptures…mysterious as to how it will work out. Salvation is by grace…but of course not every Jew will be saved!

God has loved all humanity as he may have mercy on all of them. He shows mercy to humanity! So all Jewish people, guilty and unfaithful, may call on God and be saved!

Israel’s salvation is brought together with the Gentiles.

But…

1. Israel is “the natural branches” - close relatives of God

2. They are still the beloved according to Abraham. Isaiah 41:8.

3. Most importantly - as Paul received a dramatic vision of Christ…so it may be that the Redeemer will come to dramatically save the Israelites

So, the salvation of ethnic Israel must and will be part of the nations.

Questions 3 and 4:

Israel is not at the center of Paul’s Gospel…the center is Jesus Christ!

Paul sees himself as an ambassador to the world. He does not simply address individuals, nor does he limit himself to the Christian church. He lays claim to the cosmos.

At the same time, Paul’s commitment to Scripture raises the question of God’s fidelity. Romans 9-11: Paul wrestles with the place of Israel in redemptive history. The OT books were the Scriptures for Paul. See Isaiah - representative texts. Paul is truly a representative of others.

Paul so well knows these texts that he is able to comment on the order as presented in the OT texts. So Paul provides a bridge between these two worlds. History from one sequence of events helps us see what God is doing in the context of Paul.

This is what Paul means by “mystery”. Isaiah 59 - Paul’s citation of this text makes the most sense in response to all of Isaiah as a whole

Paul sees a vision of the new humanity. Israel will be sharing in the benefits of God’s goodness. Paul’s provocation to jealousy for the Israelites therefore comes from his understanding of Isaiah’s condemnation of Israel for rejecting God’s goodness. From this it is clear that the Jews cannot bring themselves into God’s presence.

Then we see that the “Redeemer will come from Zion” - this is what motivates Paul! Salvation is God’s alone…Israel and the nations alone cannot produce salvation (see Isaiah 59:20, Romans 11:26).

Isaiah 60:19 - the Lord will be the everlasting light (for the Jews).

- God will come and intervene on the behalf of his people. But the freedom of God’s mercy does not allow us to predict the form or the time during which this will unfold. Israel strayed from the Scriptures…even at Pentecost the Jews became more Torah focused. Torah wisdom was central, and it became more divisive.

Finally, how do Christians communicate with Jews?

- evangelical Christians have a unique privilege of building bridges. But we are often not aware of the discussions that have been transpiring over the past 2,000 years! We need to educate ourselves…studying the Second Temple period is recommended. We have islands that evangelicals are not aware of. We are often unaware of God’s continuing grace during the Second Temple period.

Evangelicals must not think that Israelites are either all right or all wrong. Anti-Semitic leanings are to be absolutely condemned, but our fear of it should not lead us to opposite extremes either.

Comments from Dr. Mitch Glaser

Intro: Dr. Glaser is  Messianic Jew from Brooklyn. Became a Christian during the Jesus Movement out in California. He “takes Romans 9-11 personally” - as he assumes Paul does as well.

Question 1:

Thinks that Paul uses Romans 9-11 as an attempt to bear his soul to the Israelites. It is evangelism in and of itself.

- The “All Israel” in Romans 9-11 refers to all ethnic Jews that accept Jesus Christ as Savior before the Second Coming.

- The fullness of God’s promises will not come to the Jews until they accept Christ.

Additional points:

- Dr. Glaser thinks Romans 9-11 refers to a cataclysmic, End Times event. So Dr. Glaser is looking to evangelize to the Last Gentile (laughter).

- Jeremy Cone - Harvard Theological review - quoted Origen…the fullness of the Lord’s portion will not be complete until the Israelites come to faith in the End Times. This will complete the fullness.

- Robert Murray M’Cheyne agrees, so does Spurgeon

Spurgeon quote: the day will come when the Israelites will be gathered…but until then the glory of the church will not be complete.

Question 2:

Who is All Israel?

It seems impossible that “all Israel” includes Gentiles. There seems to be a clear distinction here.

“All Israel” will be ethnic Jews that receive the fullness of God’s promises before the Second Coming. Again, this will be a cataclysmic event.

Question 3:

Jerusalem will be saved…God will intervene (reference to Dr. Feinberg Sr. and his comments on the matter).

Important to note that God takes the initiative in pouring out his Spirit. The nation of Israel will not be saved by weapons of war made by human hands…but by the Spirit. The Holy Spirit will lead the Jews to repentance.

So Romans 11 is a fulfillment of Zechariah 12

Question 4:

For the church to evangelize the world without evangelizing the Jews in disgraceful

Romans 1:16 - must view this passage in view of Romans 11. It implies a priority rather than a sequential order of events. Same language as Matthew in seeking “first the kingdom of God”

So there must be a priority of concern…and Paul focused on Gentiles of course…but it did not lessen his concern for the Jewish people. He often evangelized to the Jews before he evangelized to the Gentiles

Thus, Paul’s behavior in Acts is a commentary on his language in Romans 11

J Hudson Taylor story

- we learn that one mission does not negate our command for another mission!

- Gentiles have a lot of love for the Jewish people, but sometimes Dr. Glaser often feels like evangelism to the Jews feels like a great omission rather than part of the Great Commission

- There is a uniqueness to Jewish evangelism in regards to the special role the Jews play in God’s soteriological plan.

Reaching Jews for the gospel must be a priority concern for all Christians since it the final step before the second coming

We need to connect Romans 11 to Romans 10 - all who call on the Lord will be saved. No distinction at the foot of the cross. Jewish people are saved the way Gentiles are saved. The Word of God produces faith in the hearts of those who believe in every age!

- We are God’s instruments of those who be part of the End Time Remnant. The Gospel must be preached to the Jews, no matter when that day will come.

Romans 11:11 - Salvation has come to the Gentiles to makes them jealous. Paul sees a special role for the Gentiles in bringing Jews to faith…so of these Gentiles will be in the audience today, or perhaps watching on screen!

Five Minute Break for Refreshments

Questions from Speakers to Fellow Speakers

Dr. Glaser to Dr Moo - something dramatic happens when the Jews accept Christ it seems in Romans 11, do you agree?

-Dr. Moo agrees…the resurrection will occur

-Dr. VanGemeren - His hope is that there will be salvation of Israel, and then the consummation of the ages.

Dr. VanGemeren to Dr. Moo - doesn’t think that all prophecy is fulfilled through the church (which Dr. Moo seems to think). There is a special role for Israel in the final days.

Dr. Feinberg - because of unconditional nature of OT covenants…there is something in store for the Israelites. Romans 11:25-27 is about the salvation of Israel per se.

Dr. Moo - Sees the pattern of fulfillment in the NT, but Dr. Moo thinks that people in this era fulfill that pattern. Christ fulfills the prophecies, which are extended to the church and not Israel as a nation necessarily

Dr. Moo to Dr. Glaser on evangelism - Dr. Moo doesn’t think that Jewish evangelism should be a priority. Points to Romans 2 and the reversal of the Romans 1:16 pattern.

Dr. Averbeck to Dr. Glaser and Dr. VanGemeren - what about this issue of the land?

- Dr. Glaser - what about all the prophesies that speak about the land and the kingdom that are not quoted in the NT? Do we have the right to say that because some prophecies are fulfilled by the church, that therefore all will be fulfilled by the church? Dr. Glaser thinks not.

- Dr. VanGemeren - God is faithful, but he is also sovereign and free. Let’s not bind him with our interpretations. The NT accords with Moses and the Prophets, but it is not a one-to-one relationship per se.

Question and Answer: End of Live Blog


Live Webcast of “All Israel”

February 3rd, 2010

In just a few short hours, the Henry Center will host a high-level theological conversation on the meaning of the phrase “All Israel” (Romans 11:26).  To view the live webcast, please visit http://tiuproductions.com/livestream/ or click here to be taken to the link.

The following is a short summary of what this event will cover.  We hope to see you there–whether online or in-person.

On February 3, 2010 from 7pm-9:30 in ATO Chapel at Trinity Evangelical Divinity School, the Henry Center, in conjunction with Chosen People Ministries, will host a conversation entitled “‘All Israel’ and the Church: A Conversation on Scripture, Eschatology, and Evangelism”. Conversational partners will include Dr. Mitch Glaser of CPM, Dr. Douglas Moo of Wheaton College, Dr. Willem VanGemeren of Trinity Evangelical Divinity School, Dr. John Feinberg of TEDS, and the moderator, Dr. Richard Averbeck of TEDS. All are welcome and invited to this free event.

The following outlines possible avenues of discussion:

    In Romans 11 Paul makes the case that God has not cast off his people Israel, despite their rejection as a nation of Jesus, their Messiah. His final argument that God isn’t finished with Israel is that “all Israel will be saved” (Rom 1l:25-27). What did Paul mean and how will this come to pass? Who constitutes “Israel,” the biological seed of Abraham or his spiritual seed? Is the salvation in view spiritual, national, socio-economical, or all of these? Has this promise been fulfilled during the NT era by individual Jews and Gentiles turning to Christ and hence “filling up” the “all Israel?” Or is the promise to be fulfilled in the end-times at the return of Christ? If the latter, will only those biologically Jewish be saved, or will there also be a massive turning to Christ among the Gentiles? Whatever the answers to such questions, what are the implications for how Christians should understand the modern state of Israel? And, of most practical importance, how should one’s understanding of Rom 11:25-27 impact one’s attitudes toward and efforts in evangelizing Jews?

Richard Mouw: Confessions of an Evangelical Pietist

January 20th, 2010

live-blogged by Andy Naselli

(Streaming video is available here.)

Richard Mouw, president of Fuller Theological Seminary in Pasadena, California since 1993, is speaking on “Confessions of an Evangelical Pietist” here at Trinity Evangelical Divinity School. Here is how this lecture was advertised:

The Christian community needs to work at integrating our doctrine, action and piety (”head, hands and heart”). But which takes priority? And a closely related issue: what, in the most basic sense, is the Bible trying to “do” to us? Shape the way we think? Guide us in the activist programs we align ourselves with in the word? Transform our inner life? Obviously, all three are crucial. But Richard Mouw will explain why he keeps coming back to the fundamental need to be guided in everything else by the kind of piety that characterized the “sawdust trail” of our revivalist past.

* * * * * * *

When Mouw taught at philosophy at Calvin College back in the mid-1970s, his colleague Nicholas Wolterstorff set forth a typology of different “minds” within the conservative Dutch Calvinist community in North America.  These labels signified, for him, three different perspectives on the kind of book the Bible is:

  1. the “doctrinalist”: The Bible primarily sets forth religious teachings—doctrines to which we must give our assent.
  2. the “pietist”: The Bible tends to be treated as a devotional handbook, the reading of which is meant to generate certain godly experiences and to form important subjective dispositions.
  3. the “Kuyperian”: The Bible is meant to give us our cultural marching orders, instructing us in the ways of discipleship in the collective patterns of life in the larger human community.

In the final analysis, Mouw is a pietist. (And Abraham Kuyper was also a pietist.) He wants to do two things in this lecture:

  1. He wants to bear witness to the basic pietist emphasis on the priority of inner transformation—an emphasis that he thinks best comports with an evangelical understanding of how to integrate “head, heart and hands.”
  2. He wants to confess some of his own worries about some of the defective tendencies that seem constantly to plague a pietist-kind of Christianity, as well as pointing to ways that a healthy pietism can enrich our doctrinal and cultural explorations.

There is no better example of what pietists are about than John Wesley’s well-known testimony regarding his “Aldersgate experience.” The kind of very direct and datable experience that Wesley was describing has a link in Mouw’s own spiritual journey to the fundamentalist “altar calls” of his youth.

Ernest Stoeffler’s magnum opus, The Rise of Evangelical Pietism, still stands as the best overall survey of pietism as an international movement. While he did much to highlight pietism’s strengths, Stoeffler was not insensitive to the movement’s faults. He specifically singled out three of what he described as its “less admirable” traits or tendencies:

  1. an “escapist” mentality that puts “the emphasis on blessedness in the hereafter rather than justice for all in the here and now”
  2. “a certain anti-intellectual atmosphere”
  3. a “pronounced tendency toward sectarian fragmentation”

Mouw embraces a pietism in which our intellectual lives, our cultural engagements, and our relationships with others in the body of Christ are guided by a personal and communal godliness.

Mouw places a priority on piety because the religion of the heart in turn must give direction to our heads and our hands.

Some “doctrinalists” are not opposed to seeing the heart as the primary locus of religious faith. John Calvin clearly refused to conflate mind and heart.

The heart, in the biblical sense, is the place where we form our fundamental trustings.

Mouw recognizes that what he is going to say about piety and doctrine will make some evangelicals nervous, so he begins with some appeals to the authority of three of his heroes, all theologians with impeccable orthodox and Calvinist credentials:

  1. Charles Hodge disagreed with Friedrich Schleiermacher’s theology but then concludes, “Can we doubt that he is singing those praises now? To whomever Christ is God, St. John assures us, Christ is a Saviour” (Systematic Theology, 2:440n1).
  2. Herman Bavinck frequently criticized Roman Catholic theology, but he also wrote, “We must remind ourselves that the Catholic righteousness by good works is vastly preferable to a protestant righteousness by good doctrine. At least righteousness by good works benefits one’s neighbor, whereas righteousness by good doctrine only produces lovelessness and pride. Furthermore, we must not blind ourselves to the tremendous faith, genuine repentance, complete surrender and the fervent love for God and neighbor evident in the lives and work of many Catholic Christians” (The Certainty of Faith, 37).
  3. Cornelius Van Til disagreed strongly with Barth, but he would not say that Barth was not a Christian. A person can have a highly defective theology and still have a heart that has been transformed by the power of the Gospel of Jesus Christ.

John MacArthur, an outspoken opponent of the “Evangelicals and Catholics Together” group, disagrees. Unlike MacArthur, Mouw believes that it is possible for people to be saved without subscribing to the doctrine of justification by faith. In other words, it is possible to be justified by faith without being clear (or believing the wrong thing) about the doctrine of justification by faith.

Mouw’s argument goes along these lines with those who show a genuine faith in Christ in spite of what he takes to be defective theology:

  • Is your theology adequate to explain the saving grace that has transformed your inner being?
  • Is that theology capable of sustaining the kind of faith that you claim?
  • (and Van Til’s question to Barth) Is your theology, when spelled out as an evangelistic appeal, capable of presenting the gospel in such a way that people will come to Christ?

Our theology would often be in much better shape if we paid careful attention to what we are expressing in the hymns that we sing.

Mouw Lecture Live-Stream

January 20th, 2010

The Center is pleased to make today’s 1PM CST lecture by Dr. Richard Mouw on evangelical pietism available for free by live stream.  To view the lecture, please visit http://tiuproductions.com/livestream.

Wednesday, January 20, 2010 | Richard Mouw | Fuller Theological Seminary, Pasadena, CA “Confessions of an Evangelical Pietist”  (1pm in ATO Chapel at TEDS)

    The Christian community needs to work at integrating our doctrine, action and piety (”head, hands and heart”). But which takes priority? And a closely related issue: what, in the most basic sense, is the Bible trying to “do” to us? Shape the way we think? Guide us in the activist programs we align ourselves with in the word? Transform our inner life? Obviously, all three are crucial. But Richard Mouw will explain why he keeps coming back to the fundamental need to be guided in everything else by the kind of piety that characterized the “sawdust trail” of our revivalist past.

Debate on “All Israel”

January 13th, 2010

On February 3, 2010 from 7pm-9:30 in ATO Chapel at Trinity Evangelical Divinity School, the Henry Center, in conjunction with Chosen People Ministries, will host a conversation entitled “How and When Will All Israel Be Saved? A Theological/Missiological Conversation on Scripture, the End-Times, and Jewish Evangelism.”

Conversational partners will include Dr. Mitch Glaser of CPM, Dr. Douglas Moo of Wheaton College, Dr. Willem VanGemeren of Trinity Evangelical Divinity School, Dr. John Feinberg of TEDS, and the moderator, Dr. Richard Averbeck of TEDS.  All are welcome and invited to this free event.

The following outlines possible avenues of discussion:

In Romans 11 Paul makes the case that God has not cast off his people Israel, despite their rejection as a nation of Jesus, their Messiah. His final argument that God isn’t finished with Israel is that “all Israel will be saved” (Rom 1l:25-27). What did Paul mean and how will this come to pass? Who constitutes “Israel,” the biological seed of Abraham or his spiritual seed? Is the salvation in view spiritual, national, socio-economical, or all of these? Has this promise been fulfilled during the NT era by individual Jews and Gentiles turning to Christ and hence “filling up” the “all Israel?”  Or is the promise to be fulfilled in the end-times at the return of Christ? If the latter, will only those biologically Jewish be saved, or will there also be a massive turning to Christ among the Gentiles? Whatever the answers to such questions, what are the implications for how Christians should understand the modern state of Israel? And, of most practical importance, how should one’s understanding of Rom 11:25-27 impact one’s attitudes toward and efforts in evangelizing Jews?

The event will be webcasted live and live-blogged by the Center.  All are welcome and invited to attend.  No tickets will be distributed; seating will go quickly, however, and attendees are encouraged to arrive early to avoid confusion.

With Chosen People Ministries, the Henry Center anticipates a lively and edifying conversation on the nature and future of the Israel as seen by the Apostle Paul and interpreted by modern-day theologians.

Yale & TEDS: New JEC

January 12th, 2010

jonathanedwardsThe Henry Center is very pleased to make the following announcement.

From: HCTU Director Doug Sweeney
RE: New Jonathan Edwards Center at TEDS
Date: 1/12/2010

In conjunction with the Jonathan Edwards Center of Yale University, Trinity Evangelical Divinity School is pleased to announce the formation of a new Jonathan Edwards Center at TEDS, effective immediately.  This partnership was formalized on the campus of TEDS on Wednesday, January 6, 2010.  Kenneth P. Minkema, director of the Yale Center, and Douglas A. Sweeney, director of the Trinity Center, both spoke to this groundbreaking development and noted its excellent prospects.

The Center at TEDS is the newest of several satellite Edwards Centers founded by Yale’s Edwards Center in strategic locations around the world. The purpose of these Centers is to promote awareness of and scholarship on Edwards in the academy and also the church.  Existing locations include Germany (Tübingen), Poland, South Africa, and Australia (Ridley College).  The Jonathan Edwards Center at Trinity is, apart from the Yale Center, the only existing such center in North America.

The JEC at Trinity provides a rare opportunity for us to engage the larger world of Edwards studies, and to share the riches of that world with our community.  The Center will debut a website near the end of February that will offer our academic and ecclesial communities access to a wide range of Edwards resources.  The Center will also feature a designated computer terminal in the library on which students and visiting scholars will be able to access a wealth of resources for the study of Edwards and related figures and movements throughout history. Trinity is the only school in North America, other than Yale, with access to this range of materials.

sweeneyminkemaAs Director of the new Center, Sweeney is currently planning the further development of its work. In coming weeks, the JEC will announce a program of events.  In addition to regular conferencing, the JEC at Trinity will offer two lecture series: “Jonathan Edwards and the Church,” which will feature the best Christian Edwards scholars in the world in conversation with Sweeney and a variety of clergy who are interested in Edwards and his legacies to the church; and “New Directions in Edwards Studies,” which will feature cutting-edge research on Edwards and his influence.

Furthermore, the JEC at TEDS will seek to encourage Trinity students, and other students in the region, to undertake advanced work on Edwards and his legacies around the world. It will provide pastors and scholars with up-to-date web resources for making good on Edwards’ legacy and for staying up on the most important Edwards scholarship.

Those interested in the JEC at TEDS should look for a second announcement in late February that will make public the new website and announce a range of programs.  It is with gratefulness to God, and thanks to our friends at Yale, that we announce this unique partnership.

(Photo of Sweeney (L) and Minkema (R) by Jeff Calhoun/TEDS)

Media Is Up for the 2009 Conference on Short-Term Missions

December 20th, 2009

The Henry Center is pleased to announce that videos of talks presented at the 2009 Conference on Short-Term Missions are now posted free of charge for the viewing of the general public.


July 30 - August 1, 2009 | Conference on Short-Term Missions - Trinity Evangelical Divinity School

    In the summer of 2009, building on the momentum of the Henry Center’s Lima, Peru conference in 2006 (henrycenter.org/international), Dr. Robert Priest (TEDS) led a conference on Trinity’s campus on the topic of short-term mission. The conference brought together scholars, pastors, missiologists, anthropologists, youth pastors, missionaries, students and laity to think biblically and practically about short-term missions.

    Miriam Adeney — Associate Professor of Global and Urban Ministries, Seattle Pacific University
    “What We Can Learn From China: Short-Term Missions in the Dragon Kingdom | Video

    Eric Iverson — Multicultural Integrity Director, Youthworks
    “One Cross at a Time: The Mission Agency’s Role in Building the Missional Church” | Video

    Oscar Muriu — Pastor, Nairobi Chapel, Nairobi, Kenya
    “Short-Term Missions from a Kenyan Pastor’s Perspective” | Video

    Kara Powell — Executive Director, Fuller Youth Institute; Assistant Professor of Youth and Family Ministry, Fuller Theological Seminary
    “Deep Justice Journeys and STM for Youth”| Video

    Robert J. Priest — Director, PhD Progam in Intercultural Studies, Trinity Evangelical Divinity School; Professor of Mission and Intercultural Studies, Trinity Evangelical Divinity School
    “Megachurches and Short-Term Missions: New Priorities and Paradigms of Mission” | Video

    Kurt Ver Beek — Assistant Professor of Sociology, Calvin College
    “Different Soils and Different Seeds: Review of Research on STM and Study Abroad” | Video

    Robert Wuthnow — Director, Center for the Study of Religion, Princeton University; Chair and Professor, Department of Sociology, Princeton University
    “Short-Term Missions and the Global Reach of American Christianity” | Video

    Panel Discussion | Video

Richard Mouw’s Upcoming Lecture

December 15th, 2009

mouwThe Center is anticipating a lecture by Dr. Richard Mouw, President of Fuller Theological Seminary, on January 20, 2010.  The lecture falls within the Center’s Scripture and Ministry program.  See info about the talk below (and note that it is free and open to all).

Wednesday, January 20, 2010 | Richard Mouw | Fuller Theological Seminary, Pasadena, CA “Confessions of an Evangelical Pietist”  (1pm in ATO Chapel at TEDS)

    The Christian community needs to work at integrating our doctrine, action and piety (”head, hands and heart”). But which takes priority? And a closely related issue: what, in the most basic sense, is the Bible trying to “do” to us? Shape the way we think? Guide us in the activist programs we align ourselves with in the word? Transform our inner life? Obviously, all three are crucial. But Richard Mouw will explain why he keeps coming back to the fundamental need to be guided in everything else by the kind of piety that characterized the “sawdust trail” of our revivalist past.

Upcoming 2010 Events

December 15th, 2009

It’s time to start marking your calendar for the Center’s full slate of spring events.  The following is a partial list of upcoming offerings, all of which are free and open to all:

Scripture and Ministry Series — Richard Mouw January 20-21, 2010

    Lecture: Jan 20 | 1PM ATO Chapel

Timothy Series — Wayne Ogimachi Feb 9, 11, 2010

    Chapel: Feb 9 | 11AM ATO ChapelChapel: Feb 11 | 11AM ATO Chapel

Scripture and Ministry Series — Christine Pohl March 17-18, 2010

    Lecture: Mar 17 | 1PM ATO Chapel

Timothy Series — Dave Johnson April 20, 22, 2010

    Chapel: Apr 20 | 11AM ATO ChapelChapel: Apr 22 | 11AM ATO Chapel

programsPublicationsDirectionsAudio ArchiveContactSearchHome

© 2007 Trinity Evangelical Divinity School, Deerfield, IL All rights reserved | website by latentDesign